The Hidden History of Poland from Ancient Times to the Present Day.

05 September 2017

Bolesław Chrobry | Bolesław the Brave






Bolesław I, byname Bolesław the Brave, Polish Bolesław Chrobry (born 966/967—died June 17, 1025), duke (from 992) and then (from 1024) first king of Poland, who expanded his country’s territory to include Pomerania, Lusatia, and, for a time, the Bohemian princely lands. He made Poland a major European state and also created a Polish church independent of German control.





The son of Mieszko I, the first of the Piast dukes, and the Bohemian princess Dobrawa (Dubravka), Bolesław I inherited the principality of Great Poland (Wielkopolska, between the Oder and the Warta rivers) upon his father’s death in 992. He soon began, by energetic political and military action, to develop and expand the Polish state. He conquered Pomerania along the Baltic Sea in 996 and seized Kraków (formerly a Bohemian possession) soon afterward. He ransomed the relics of the martyred St. Adalbert, bishop of Prague, from the pagan Prussians and buried the relics at Gniezno. The Holy Roman emperor Otto III, who had been Adalbert’s student and Bolesław’s ally since 992, attended that ceremony (March 1000) and marked the occasion by personally acknowledging Bolesław as the sovereign ruler of Poland. With Pope Sylvester II’s approval, the emperor granted Poland its own archdiocese, with Gniezno as its seat. Bolesław then reorganized Poland’s church structure, making it a national church directly under papal jurisdiction and independent of German ecclesiastical control.



After Emperor Otto III’s death (1002), Bolesław seized the imperial lands of Lusatia and Misnia (Meissen) and the principality of Bohemia. These actions started a series of three wars between him and the German king Henry II that lasted until 1018, when, by the Treaty of Bautzen, Bolesław retained Lusatia and Misnia and Henry II won Bohemia. Bolesław’s expansionist policy continued. When he defeated Grand Prince Yaroslav I the Wise of Kiev in battle (July 21, 1018) and placed his own son-in-law (and Yaroslav’s brother), Svyatopolk, on the Kievan throne, his control extended from the western tributaries of the middle Elbe River to the eastern reaches of the Bug River. Though recognized as a sovereign by Otto III in 1000, Bolesław sought to strengthen his position and his independence from imperial control with his papally-sanctioned coronation by the archbishop of Gniezno on Dec. 25, 1024

Queen Wanda






Ancient Cave in Moravia still stumps Archeologists







Was it a funeral sacrifice of mammoth proportions, the vicious slaughter of a merchant caravan or a massive explosion of flour dust during a harvest ceremony? More than a century after it was first excavated, archaeologists are still wondering what happened in Bull Rock (Byci skala) cave in the Blansko area of south Moravia 2,600 years ago. 

Bones and jewelry dating back 2,600 years, discovered in the cave in 1872, have mystified scientists ever since [Credit: Prague Post]
In 1872, Czech archaeologist Jindrich Wankel unearthed 40 dismembered skeletons in the anteroom of the cave. On a stone altar was a pair of women's arms hacked off at the elbow, and a skull cleaved neatly down the middle. Deeper in the cave was a magnificent chariot with the charred remains of a man still inside. Strewn among the bodies were hundreds of bronze and amber ornaments of exotic design and, deeper in the cave, stood an Iron Age forge. 

Wankel assumed he'd found the relics of the funeral of a chieftain from the Hallstatt (Early Iron Age) era, complete with virgin sacrifices. For more than 100 years, archaeologists took his conclusions at face value. Then, in the 1970s, they took another look at the artifacts and received quite a shock. 

Wankel's "funeral chariot" was actually different parts of three completely unrelated vehicles. The skeletons were not from young females - virgin or otherwise - but from men and women ranging in age from 30 to 45. Moreover, there was no proof the victims had died violently. 

So what really happened in the Bull Rock Cave 26 centuries ago? 

One theory is that a merchant caravan traveling along the Amber Route, laden down with valuable objects for trade, was trapped and slaughtered in the cave by bandits. But if this is true, why would the attackers leave so many valuable objects behind? 

Another theory, espoused by archaeologist and Hallstatt-era specialist Martin Golec, speaks of a sect of blacksmith-priests who had their workshop in the cave and turned to human sacrifice to ensure the successful outcome of their creations. 

"Ironworking was viewed as a magical process," Golec tells The Prague Post. 

According to Golec, the artifacts in the cave date to a period between 700 and 650 BC, when the iron-rich Brno basin was undergoing an explosive transformation from bronze to iron technology. 

"It was a boom equivalent to the Industrial Revolution. Suddenly bronze, which had to be imported from far away, was replaced by a material lying around on the ground. The economic and political power centers shifted overnight," he says. 

According to another theory, the cave was the abode of an agricultural community whose constant grinding of grain filled the air with flour dust until it reached a flash point. The ensuing explosion would have torn the cave's inhabitants limb from limb. 

"A daring theory, considering that the humidity inside [the cave] is close to 100 percent," says Ales Pekarek of the Bull Rock Cave Speleological Group. 

Interpreting the relics 

To complicate the matter further, archaeologists don't know the identities of the people in the cave, since the relics come from all over Europe: amber from the Baltic, bronze belts typical of northern Italy and iron weapons from the Caucasus. 


Finger-ring [Credit: Prague Post]
Two prevailing theories explain how and why so many valuable objects found their way into the cave. 

One is that Bull Rock was an ancient sacrificial cave: People from all over the region would come to offer material, animal and human gifts to the gods, casting them down a long chute ending high above the floor of the cave. 

"They've found artifacts dating back to the Paleolithic," Golec says. "This cave was the regional equivalent of the Parthenon." 

Still, this does not explain the simultaneous death of 40 people. 

Another theory looks at the regional context. 

In the 6th century BC, two major trade routes crossed in the Brno area. One ran from the Caucasus through the Balkans to France and the other from southern Italy to the Baltic. Trade brought sophistication - and wealth. Artisans learned to copy the items coming along the trade routes, and specialized workshops evolved - the forge in the cave might have been one such example. The area prospered, and a noble class evolved to protect the growing tribal treasures. 

But around 650 BC, it all came to an end. 

Fierce mounted warriors from the East, known as Scythians, swooped down on the peaceful agricultural society. The nobles decamped to the west, and commoners hid their treasures - and themselves - in the caves of the Moravian karst. 

"My very tentative theory is that a group hid in the cave, built wooden shelters inside and these caught fire, which quickly exhausted the oxygen, and they all suffocated," says Petr Kos, an archaeologist at the Institute of Archaeological Monument Preservation. 

Another theory, developed by Golec, elegantly incorporates all the evidence. 

"Scythians could have attacked a village when the men were away hunting. When they returned and found their families dead, they brought the bodies to a holy place - the cave," he says. 

Still, all of these theories remain speculative until new evidence is found. 

The biggest problem is that modern archaeologists have no clue how the victims died because they lack forensic evidence. 

"Wankel only preserved the skulls and buried the rest of the skeletons in an unknown place. For all we know, they could be in the cave," says Bull Rock Speleological Group Chairman Jiri Svozil, who adds that much of the archaeological records was lost during the excavation, which took a mere two months. 

"Today, a site like that would employ archaeologists for decades," he says. 

Unfortunately, the site was irrevocably destroyed when the Nazis turned the antechamber into a munitions factory in 1945. Still, there are those who say the cave hasn't given up all its secrets. So far, only the amphitheater and a first passage have been excavated. Who knows what surprises await within the remaining 13 kilometers of passageways and still-undiscovered chambers in the heart of the Moravian karst?

Author: Eva Munk | Source: The Prague Post [October 26, 2011]

Protection of Nature in Poland







Protection of nature in Poland has a centuries-old tradition. The oldest law concerning the protection of wild animals comes from the time of the first King of Poland, Boleslaw Chrobry (eleventh century AD), and relates to the prohibition of hunting beavers. King Kazimierz Wielki, in the Piotrków-Wiślica Statutes, ordered the protection of forests, while Wladyslaw Jagiello in 1423 introduced to the Warta Statute provisions on the protection of yew and “large animals” and wild game protection periods. The dukes of Mazovia took special care of aurochs, and they even set up a special guard to protect it. King Zygmunt I, in the Statute of Lithuania (1523), took protection over, inter alia, bison, aurochs, beaver, falcon and swan.


A modern approach to nature protection was initiated in the nineteenth century, which was caused by rapid development of industry, urbanisation and intensification of agriculture. Predatory activity conducted by people brought about the deforestation of large areas, soil erosion, changes in water balance and environmental pollution, and thus profound and often irreversible changes in the natural environment. 







In Poland in the 1920s, many nature reserves were created. In 1923, restitution of wisent in the Bialowieza Forest began, and in 1932, the following two first national parks within the territory of Poland were designated: ”Bialowieza National Park”, covering part of the Bialowieza Forest, and ”Pieniny National Park”, covering Pieniny.


In 1939 in Poland, in addition to the listed national parks, 211 nature reserves and hundreds of monuments of nature existed. After World War II, the first Nature Protection Act was enacted in 1949. In 1991, a new act was enacted in which the following forms of nature protection were added: landscape parks, protected landscape areas, documentation sites, ecological sites and nature and landscape complexes. Currently, the act of 16 April 2004 on the protection of nature applies.


Forms of environmental protection in Poland within the meaning of the Act of 16 April 2004 on the protection of nature are: 
national parks (specific areas of outstanding natural, scientific, social, cultural and educational values, with an area of ??not less than 1,000 ha, where all nature and landscape values are protected. National parks are created under the Regulation of the Council of Ministers. Currently in Poland, there are 23 national parks covering more than 3,000 km², which represents about 1% of the country’s area); 
nature reserves (the most important form of nature protection after national parks, designated under the order of the regional director of environmental protection. Currently in Poland, there are over 1,400 nature reserves, covering around 0.5% of the country’s area. Human activities in national parks and nature reserves may be conducted only in places designated in the protection plan, which is drawn up for a period of 20 years); 
landscape parks (a less restrictive form of nature protection as compared to national parks or nature reserves, created under the resolution of the voivodeship council. Economic activity may be conducted within the landscape park area, but there is a catalogue of prohibitions that may be introduced by persons managing that form of nature protection. Currently in Poland, there are 121 landscape parks covering approximately 8.3% of the country’s area); 
protected landscape areas (areas of outstanding natural, landscape and cultural values and diverse ecosystems, valuable for their tourist and recreational attractions or forming ecological corridors. These areas are designated under the resolution of the voivodeship council. Currently on Polish territory, 384 protected landscape areas, covering over 22% of the country’s area, are designated); 
Natura 2000 areas (currently, the European Natura 2000 network in Poland includes 141 special protection areas for birds, covering 15.6% of the country's land area, and 823 special areas of habitats protection, representing 11.05% of Polish land. In total, Natura 2000 areas occupy approximately 19.7% of the land area. Supervision of Natura 2000 areas or proposed areas relevant for the community is held by the regional director of environmental protection in the area of ??its competence. Sea areas are supervised by the director of the maritime office, and where the area lies wholly or includes part of a national park, the director of that park. More information about the European ecological network Natura 2000 in Poland can be found at:
natural monuments (individual objects of an animate and inanimate nature or their agglomeration, presenting particular protection, scientific, cultural or landscape values - such as single trees or shrubs, distinctive for their venerable age, size or other unique features, historic avenues as well as large glacial boulders, rocks, grottos, caves, springs, etc. In Poland, more than 34,000 objects are covered by this type of legal protection); 
documentation sites (location of geological formations, accumulation of fossils or mineral formations, important in terms of research and teaching, and the location of the fossil remains of plants or animals. Currently in Poland, there are 240 of these sites); 
ecological sites (valuable in terms of nature, but are not eligible to be covered by nature reserve protection, are the areas forming remnants of ecosystems which are relevant for the protection of biological diversity, such as natural bodies of water, mid-field and mid-forest ponds, clumps of trees and shrubs, swamps, bogs, dunes, strands of rare or protected plants, animals and fungi, etc. In Poland in 2009, there were 6,628 ecological lands); 
nature and landscape complexes (parks smaller than landscape parks, including fragments of natural and cultural landscapes, which are protected due to their scenic and aesthetic values. In Poland, this form of protection covers 287 areas); 
protection of species of plants, animals and fungi (intended to maintain a favourable protection status of wild species of plants, animals and fungi and their habitats and preserve species and genetic diversity. Species of wild plants under protection are specified in the Regulation of the Ministry of the Environment of 9 July 2004, Journal of Laws of 2004, No. 168, item 1764 [PL]. Species of wild animals under protection are specified in the Regulation of the Ministry of the Environment of 28 September 2004, Journal of Laws of 2004, No. 220, item 2237 [PL]. Species wild fungi under protection are specified in the Regulation of the Ministry of the Environment of 9 July 2004, Journal of Laws of 2004, No 168, item1765 [PL]):

Count Geoffrey Wladislas Vaile Potocki de Montalk



Count Geoffrey Wladislas Vaile Potocki de Montalk (10 June 1903 – 14 April 1997) was a poet, polemicist, pagan and (incorrectly labelled) pretender to the Polish throne. Born in New Zealand, he was the eldest son of Auckland architect Robert Wladislas de Montalk, grandson of Paris-born Professor Count Joseph Wladislas Edmond Potocki de Montalk, and great-grandson of Polish-born Count Jozef Franciszek Jan Potocki, the Insurgent, of Białystok.[1]

In 1926, de Montalk left his wife and small daughter in New Zealand to be a poet by "...follow(ing) the golden road to Samarkand". He travelled to England but moved in 1949 to Draguignan in the south of France where he obtained land and a ramshackle stone cottage – the Villa Vigoni – deep in the Provençal countryside. He did not return to New Zealand until 1983. Between 1984 and 1993, he followed the sun by spending summers in either New Zealand and France. He died at Brignoles in France in 1997 and was buried at Draguignan.




Geoffrey Potocki de Montalk was one of a group of New Zealand poets which included his friends A. R. D. Fairburn and R. A. K. Mason. However, his proposed career as a romantic poet was severely affected by a court case in 1932. He was arrested after attempting to publish a manuscript of erotic translations of works by Rabelais and Verlaine, with three short bawdy verses of his own. Though the manuscript had not actually been published, it had been shown to a printer at the Methodist Recorder in London who reported de Montalk to the police on the grounds of obscenity. The subsequent charge was "obscene libel", specifically in relation to the work "Lament for Sir John Penis". On 8 February 1932 he appeared before Sir Ernest Wild, Recorder of London at the Central Criminal Court and after a celebrated trial – at which he was supported by Leonard and Virginia Woolf and many of the leading writers of the day – he was sentenced to six months in Wormwood Scrubs. He later said that when it was asked who had been libelled, the answer given by the prosecution was "Sir John Penis"!

He emerged from prison bitter and determined to flout English convention. He adopted a mock-medieval style of dress, wearing sandals and a crimson tunic, and a cloak made from a length of scarlet curtain he had begun wearing soon after arrival in London and had worn during his trial. His hair, which had been allowed to grow in prison, continued to grow until it was waist length. After his release he travelled to Warsaw, where he was well received and reported on by the newspapers.

He returned to England in 1935, to cover the Silver Jubilee of George V, who died shortly thereafter. When Edward VIII declared his intention to marry American divorcee Wallis Simpson, against the wishes of Prime Minister Baldwin, and was forced to abdicate, Potocki de Montalk printed a manifesto supporting the King and chastising Baldwin, distributing copies in Downing Street and was arrested. Aldous Huxley sent his wife to arrange bail and later funded the purchase of Potocki's first printing press. Potocki married for the second time in 1939.

From 1936 onwards, Potocki produced his extreme right-wing literary publication, the Right Review (1936–73).[2] The Right Review was intended as a response to the Left Review.[3] The first issue of The Right Review, in October carried a statement of Potocki's own monarchist position:


It is our aim to show that the Divine Right of Kings is the sanest and best form of government, being in the last resort the only fount of power and consequently of human life. We intend to prove that such government is intensely beneficial to the whole human race including the lowest races of mankind. In this way we hope to provide the Right Wing with a living ideology.[2]

The publication was noted for its strong support of the Spanish Nationalists; it attacked T. S. Eliot for not expressing support for the Nationalists.[3] The Right Review also published poetry by Roy Campbell and D. S. Savage.[3]

Over the next four decades, Potocki published his own poetry and pamphlets.

In 1943, informed by Poles living in London about the massacre in the woods at Katyn of 15,000 Polish servicemen by Britain's ally, the Soviet Union, Potocki published what he considered to be his most important piece of writing, his Katyn Manifesto. The British government had been keen to keep the atrocity quiet, which the Soviet Union blamed on Nazi Germany. Potocki was arrested by Special Branchand imprisoned. Later, he was sent to an agricultural camp in Northumberland. This manifesto was the only acknowledgement of the atrocity in English. The full truth of the Katyn massacre was not to emerge for another 50 years.[4]




In 2001, his cousin Stephanie de Montalk authored a biography of this enigmatic and colourful figure. His Right Review is currently archived in the Alexander Turnbull Library at the National Library of New Zealand, which also holds all his 105 original works.


Jump up ^ http://www.counter-currents.com/2010/08/count-potocki-de-montalk-part-i/Geoffrey Potocki de Montalk: New Zealand Poet, “Polish King,” & “Good European”
^ Jump up to: a b Patrick Deane, History in Our Hands: a critical anthology of writings on literature, culture, and politics from the 1930s. London: Leicester University Press, 1998. ISBN 9780718501433, (pp. 183–4).
^ Jump up to: a b c Stanley Weintraub, The Last great cause. The intellectuals and the Spanish civil war. London: W. H. Allen, 1968. (p. 157, 165–6)
Jump up ^ http://strangeflowers.wordpress.com/2010/04/14/the-katyn-connection/The Katyn connection

Slavs among Norsemen in America and Iceland


There were Slavs living on the shores of the Baltic since antiquity. Their role on the Baltic is not very well known in the West, in spite of that it was considerable. It is interesting to see that the famous Norman vikings who plundered so much of Western Europe failed completely to duplicate their feats against the Slavs dwelling on the shores of the Baltic. In fact it is these very Slavs who often raided and pillaged the Normans instead! These Slavic raids varied greatly in size and took place on Danish, Swedish, and even Norwegian soil. Their devastating nature is well testified in the literary works of the notable Danish chronicler Saxo Grammaticus. Danes often even paid tribute to these Slavic tribes in order to avoid being raided. Many words of Slavic origin found their way to the Scandinavian vocabulary, even those that have to do with maritime issues like the words for a "boat" or a "ferry", and that fact is even recognized by Western scholars (for more details on that subject see Krystyna Pieradzka, Walki Slowian na Baltyku w X-XII Wieku, Warszawa, 1953). 

The Slavs who dwelled on the shores of the Baltic not only proved to be more than just a match for the Norsemen on the waters of the Baltic Sea, but also are known to have ventured outside of that acquen into the North Sea. Such forays took place during the Slavic raids against both Denmark and Norway. For example, on one occasion during a campaign in 1043 AD, the Polabian Slavs first defeated a Danish fleet that was send to capture Vineta, then took advantage of the victory by launching a naval expedition against Denmark. This expedition sailed south of Falster and Lolland, then between Jutland and Fionia, it fought a battle off Arhus, circumnavigated all of Jutland thus ending up on its western or North Sea side, and then crossed Schleswig by land (between the Danish strongholds of Schleswig and Haithabu) fighting much of the way in the process, and safely returned by sea to Slavia, after successfully completing the land crossing of Schleswig. In the end only during this one expedition, the Polabian Slavs managed to lay waste to many of Denmark's coastal areas.

And talking of the Slavs on the North Sea one must also add that some Slavs actually lived on the North Sea's shores, as partial settlement of the Polabian Slavs is know to have taken place in areas on the North Sea to the west of Hamburg. Also noteworthy is the participation of both Vielet and Polish warriors in a Danish expedition against England - these Slavic fighters not only crossed much of the North Sea, but even ended up fighting in distant England (see Gerard Labuda "Slowianie na Baltyku", Szczecin-Tygodnik Wybrzeza, Nr. 24).

There is even some evidence of a more significant and permanent Slavic settlement in Scandinavia, for example there are place names of Slavic origin in Denmark, and in Sweden there is at least one town that is named Wendel - and Wendel is an old Swedish name for Slavs, meaning that the town was named after Slavs who must have founded it. In fact it originally was an old Germanic designation for Slavs, at least the Western ones, and it was derived from the name of the proto-Slavic Venedi (also known as Veneti, Vineti, or Vinedi). Wendel(l) is also found as a surname in Scandinavia, and it is sometimes even used as a first name in the English-speaking and Germanic-speaking countries. For instance Patrick Hankes and Flavia Hodges in their Oxford Dictionary of First Names, Oxford University Press, 2nd edition, Oxford/New York, 1996 (c 1990), have the following to say about the origin of that name: "(m.) German: from an old Germanic personal name, in origin an ethnic byname for a Wend, a member of the Slavonic people living in the area between the [Laba/]Elbe and the [Odra/]Oder...", the same book also states that the given names of Wendelin, Wenda, and Wanda are of the same derivation.

Poland was originally a landlocked country. Nevertheless, the early Polish state during the process of expanding its boundaries did not forget to include some seashore within its limits. The first part of Pomerania to be incorporated into Poland was Eastern Pomerania with its city and port of Gdansk. Then, the central sector of Pomerania followed, with its chief city and port of Kolobrzeg. Circa 965 AD the westernmost segment of Pomerania followed with its capital at Szczecin. Some two years later Poles subdued the Slavic tribe of the Polabian-Pomeranian Vielunczans, and thus Poland's conquest of Pomerania was completed.

Eventually, as Poland consolidated its hold on the newly acquired littoral, the country established and maintained diplomatic relations with both Denmark and Sweden. One of the results of these diplomatic links was the marriage of Swietoslawa, a Polish princess of the Piast Dynasty and daughter of the Polish Duke Mieszko I, with the Swedish King Eric the Victorious. The marriage took place circa 990 AD, albeit the precise date of this event has not been established (see G. Labuda, "Polska w Zlewisku Baltyku", Jantar, Year VI, pg. 34, Booklet 1; L. Koczy, Zwiazki Malzenskie Piastow ze Skandynawami, Poznan 1933, pg. 12; Jadwiga Zylinska, Piastowny i Zony Piastow, Warszawa 1967, pgs. 23-36).

It must be added that this marriage was not a merely trivial historical event, considering the fact that Swietoslawa was the daughter and sister of the rulers of Poland, and also the wife and mother of the rulers of Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and even England. Swietoslawa is also considered to be the very first more notable Polish national to have made a trans-sea voyage. She must have definitively not been the only Pole on board her ship, as there must have been some other Poles who were chosen to accompany the princess on her journey. In Scandinavia Swietoslawa became known as Sigrid (or sometimes also as Storrad), and under that name she figures in the Norse sagas. Following Eric's death Swietoslawa married another Scandinavian monarch: King Sven the Forkbearded of Denmark. After a few years he expelled Swietoslawa from Denmark to Poland, but after his death her sons made it possible for her to return to Denmark. One of them, Canute, would become a ruler of three countries as King Canute II the Great of Denmark (1018-1035), of England as Canute I (1016-1035), and also the King of Norway (1028-1035); he was probably the most outstanding ruler in Denmark's history, especially famous for his conquest of England (started by his father), after which he also crowned himself as the king of England, and it is sad to say that very few people are aware of the fact that he was half-Polish.

According to a legend, and there are some sources both Scandinavian and Polish that seem to indicate that is more of a historical fact then only a legend, there were two Polish knights that went along with Swietoslawa to Scandinavia, and later joined the Norsemen on their journeys to Iceland, and possibly Greenland and the continental North America. These two Polish knights were named Wyzdarwoda (sometimes also known as Wyzdraw) and Tyrker (sometimes also known as Tyrkir); the latter is very frequently identified in Western sources as a "German", but the very possibility of him being Polish, or at least Slavic, will shortly be discussed here. Both eventually ended up at the royal Danish court of King Sven the Forkbearded, where they came into contact with, according to some claims, Eric the Red, or at least with some other Norse sailor who convinced the two Poles to join him on a journey to a distant island in the far north. In his companionship they sailed to Iceland, and then possibly on to Greenland, where they might have permanently settled. The notable Polish author and maritime researcher and historian, Jerzy Pertek has confirmed the existence of these two semi-legendary figures as being mentioned in the old Norse sagas, and he believes that it is possible that Wyzdarwoda, along with Tyrker, might have settled on Greenland. 

What is interesting about this whole account is that it was neither invented nor propragated by Poles, but rather by Americans. Apparently the very first Polish-language mention of this story was made by a Polish Roman Catholic priest residing in the U.S. named Waclaw Kruszka on pg. 16 in his Historya Polska w Ameryce, Vol. 1, Milwaukee, 1905 (a second edition of this 13 volume work was published in the United States in 1937). Kruszka might not have been the very first to publish that claim, either in English or Polish or in any other language, and the work that he cited as a source for this information is actually the English-language American-written Scribner's History of the U.S.A., Vol. 1, pg. 42. This book was not the work of any sensation-seeking ethno-centric Poles, but rather of unbiased and objective American scholars and researchers who somehow managed (probably using the same old Norse sources that were used by Jerzy Pertek) to establish that a journey of at least two Poles, or other Western Slavs, took place alongside the Norsemen all the way to the New World. In fact there is some evidence to support that claim, and this evidence will be examined in the following paragraphs.

Considering that great many Western sources assume that Tyrker was a German, and there is nothing in the Norse sources to support that assumption, what evidence is there to support the claim that Tyrker was a Slav, and perhaps even a Pole to be more precise? To take a look at this issue one must realize that there is no very solid basis to assume the claim that he was a German - his "German origin" is more assumed than really proven.

Here is what the Tale of the Greenlanders (also known as the Saga of the Greenlanders) has to say about Tyrker/ Tyrkir and who he really was:

"Tyrkir, a 'Southerner' in Leif's crew, wandered off on his own and found vines, from which Leif named the country."

The land to which the saga was referring to was of course Vinland. But that is a very interesting passage in another way, for as the reader can see Tyrkir is not called a German but rather a Southerner, and this particular, albeit one must say vague, designation most certainly does not rule out his possible Slavic origin. All the Western Slavs, whose Poles, Pomeranians, and Polabians are part of, just happen to live directly to the south of Scandinavians, so there should be nothing surprising for the Norsemen to refer to Western Slavs as "Southerners".

There is another fragment of the Tale of the Greenlanders which indirectly suggests Tyrker's Slavic origin. Tyrker became "immortalized" as the one who allegedely discovered "grapes" in the land that the Norsemen would go on to call as Vinland. Whether he found genuine grapes, or rather some wild berries that were much more suitable for growing in a cooler climate is hotly disputed by many scholars, albeit so far all evidence points out to that the Vinland "grapes" were not any real grapes at all. For instance Merrit L. Fernald, a professor of botany at the Harvard University, put forward a very plausible explanation to the whole mystery of the "Vinland grapes" already in 1910 in a paper published in the magazine Rhodora. He pointed out that vinber, the word in the sagas usually translated as "grapes", really meant "wineberry", which might be the wild red currant, the goose-berry, or the mountain cranberry. That also puts to rest the claim that the saga's passage when Tyrker himself says to have came from a land where there is no shortage of either grapes or vines should be understood literally. Also, according to Dr. Helge Ingstad the Norsemen might have intentionally spread a false rumour about grapes being present on Vinland, or at least they misrepresented some wild berries as "grapes", so as to entice more settlers to go there. And in this case one must add that among Norsemen wine was greatly valued, especially the one made from grapes, and to them it was a symbol of great wealth and affluence. In this case, and all the archeological evidence gathered on the Norse settlement in the continental North America supports this stance, Tyrker did not have had to originate in the Rhineland, as many supporters of his alleged "German" origin claim, but he could very well have come from a more northerly and colder area like Poland, Pomerania, or Slavia.

The passage on Tyrker's discovery of the alleged "grapes" yields one more clue to support the thesis that Tyrker was after all a Slav. In the passage on Tyrker's botanical discovery, the Tale of the Greenlanders speaks that he returned very jubilant and enthusiastic to the bewildered Normans, and started to speak to them in his own native language which none of the Norsemen could understand. Therefore, apparently Tyrker's native tongue was not a Germanic one. That is very interesting because the Norse language and German are universally recognized as being related, and in fact back in the Norse days they must have been mutually understandable (and likely they still are mutually understandable to a certain degree even today). Then, why did the Normans fail to understand him? If he had been really speaking in German, then he still should have been understandood. Apparently Tyrker's native tongue was not Germanic in origin, and as a result no Norseman could understand what Tyrker was saying in his own native speech. One must remember that Slavic and Germanic languages were not mutually understandable; therefore, was it a Slavic tongue that Tyrker was speaking to the bewildered Normans? Considering the account as it is related in the Tale of the Greenlanders that is an entirely likely scenario.

And at last we have to face the question of Tyrker's name, since as sceptics might point out it does not sound Slavic (there is no such problem with Wyzdarwoda or Wyzdraw since both of these two names, or rather variations of the same name, sound unquestionably Slavic). Yes, it does not really sound Slavic, but that does not mean that it was Tyrker's original name. It is entirely likely that Tyrker was in fact originally known by the Slavic name of Tyrko, but after he spend many years in Scandinavia that Slavic name was "Normanized" to Tyrker.

The Slavic settlement on Norse-age Iceland is not just a mere hypothesis, but a proven historical fact. In his book Odkrywanie Swiata; Polacy na Szesciu Kontynentach the outstanding Polish author, researcher, and adventurer Ryszard Badowski has the following to say on this topic: "...scholars researching the contacts of Poles with the lands of Northern Europe have confirmed Slavic settlement on the early medieval [, or Norse-age,] Iceland. Unfortunetly, the precise names of these Slavic settlers are not known." Furthermore, it is even acknowledged in Western sources that, according to the Icelandic sagas, some Norse-age settlers on Iceland did in fact claim to have been descended from royal lineages of some Slavic countries - that is by no means an outlandish claim considering the fact that there was frequent intermarriage between the various princely Polabian families, the dukal family of Pomerania, and even the ruling Piast Dynasty of Poland, with the ruling houses of the Scandinavian countries.

Interestingly, there is some additional prove in the Icelandic sagas of contacts between Iceland and the Slavic countries; for example in these ancient sources Poland is known as Pulinaland while Poles are referred to as Polavi.

Could it be that there were Slavs among the Norse explorers of America? This is entirely possible, as according to the Saga of Eric the Red on the Greenlanders' third voyage to America there were as many as 160 men and women on three ships - taking into account the fact that some Slavic settlement on Iceland indeed took place, and considering the fact that most Greenlanders were in reality relocated settlers from Iceland and their descendants, it cannot be completely ruled-out that there might have been some Slavs on board of the Norse ships sailing to the New World. The Saga of Eric the Red reports that at least three journeys to the America were undertaken by the Norsemen. Furthermore, some scholars believe that the Normans from Greenland and/or Iceland made at least several additional landings in America on timber-gathering expeditions, which continued until as late as the 1300's. Again, some sort of Slavic presence cannot be completely ruled-out in this case as well. According to the American historian Samuel Eliot Morison "Some ships may have continued their voyage[s] to Vinland in search of grapes, only to find berries and meet hostile Skrellings. But the tall timber of Markland was a valuable asset for the Greenlanders, although they could get it only in two summer months without being blocked by ice."



Bibliography



Ryszard Badowski, Odkrywanie Swiata; Polacy na Szesciu Kontynentach, Wydawnictwo Pascal, Bielsko-Biala, 2001.

Encyklopedia Popularna PWN, Panstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 16th edition, Warszawa, 1988. 

Zdzislaw Krok, Kto Odkryl Ameryke? (Fakty, Zagadki, Hipotezy), Agencja Omnipress - Spoldzielnia Pracy Dziennikarzy i Panstwowe Przedsiebiorstwo Wydawnicze "Rzeczpospolita", Warszawa, 1987.

Atlas Historyczny Polski, edited by Wladyslaw Czaplinski & Tadeusz Ladogorski, Panstwowe Przedsiebiorstwo Wydawnictw Kartograficznych im. Eugeniusza Romera, 7th edition, Wroclaw, 1987.

Atlas Historyczny Swiata, chief editor: Jozef Wolski, Panstwowe Przedsiebiorstwo Wydawnictw Kartograficznych im. Eugeniusza Romera, 2nd edition, Wroclaw, 1986.

Relja Novakovic, Balticki Sloveni u Beogradu i Srbiji, Narodna Knjiga, Beograd, 1985.

Jerzy Pertek, Polacy na Morzach i Oceanach, Vol. 1, Wydawnictwo Poznanskie, Poznan, 1981.

Ireneusz Grajewski & Jozef Wojcicki, Maly Leksykon Morski, Wydawnictwo MON, Warszawa, 1981.

Dzieje Polski, edited by Jerzy Topolski, Panstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa, 1978.

Frank Rasky, Explorers of the North; The Polar Voyagers, McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Toronto, 1976.

Jon Johannesson (translated by Haraldur Bessason), A History of the Old Icelandic Commonwealth; Islendinga Saga, University of Manitoba Press, 1974.

W.P. Cumming, R.A. Skelton, D.B. Quinn, The Discovery of North America, McClelland and Stewart Limited, Toronto, 1971.

Samuel Eliot Morison, The European Discovery of America; The Northern Voyages A.D. 500-1600, Oxford University Press, New York, 1971.

Jeannette Mirsky (introduction by Vilhjalmur Stefansson), To the Arctic!; The Story of Northern Exploration from Earliest Times to the Present, The University of Chicago Press, 3rd edition, Chicago, 1970 (c 1934, 1948).

Helge Ingstad (translated by Erik J. Friis), Westward to Vinland; The Discovery of Pre-Columbian Norse House-sites in North America, St. Martin's Press, 1st American edition, New York, 1969. 

Tryggvi J. Oleson, Early Voyages and Northern Approaches 1000-1632, McClelland and Stewart Limited, Toronto, 1963.

Polish and Hungarian Renaissance Lute Music